Notes On Blogging


Blogging is part of the social internet, as opposed to the walled-off apps of social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram…). You own your blog web address and its content instead of renting space from companies intent on keeping you inside their confines as they sell data about you. 

Blogging is free of the Liking economy, but participates in the Sharing economy. Once a blog is up and running, it doesn’t matter if anyone likes it. It finds its own obsessions and in so doing generates its own momentum. 

Blogging creates its own community. The momentum generated by writing about your interests and putting that online leads other people to you. My blog, for example, has been cited in books and Amazon press blurbs. That’s the Sharing economy in action.

Blogging makes your thinking public. A blog is an archive of your thoughts, hypotheses, and connections that is searchable by anyone, anywhere, anytime.

Blogging encourages longer form explorations of whatever you find interesting or significant. The pleasure of pursuing your interests in long form is an antidote to the Shallow Life, however you define that. Distilled to its essentials, a blog post says: Hey, look what I found. Or, Hey, consider what I’m thinking about. Sharing your distilled interests leads you to a deeper level of engagement.   

Blogging encourages you to think through whether or not what you want to say has substance. As you blog, you evaluate what is and isn’t worth saying.

Blogging promotes independent thought. Yes, there are many a blog dedicated to say, stream of consciousness poetry, but these are noises amongst signals. As you think through what is and isn’t worth saying, make your thinking public through longer form explorations, create community, free yourself from the Liking economy, and join the social internet, it helps you ignore the noises and focus on the good stuff—which is what everyone else is not talking about. 

Try to be a signal, not a noise.

Some other posts on blogging:

Resonant Thoughts: Brian Eno On Moire Patterns In Music


“A Moiré pattern is an interference pattern produced by overlaying similar but slightly offset templates. A simple example is obtained by taking two identical ruled transparent sheets of plastic, superposing them, and rotating one about its center as the other is held fixed.”

“Now a moire pattern… is actually a very good analog of the Steve Reich piece [It’s Gonna Rain] in action. Something happens because of one’s perception rather than because of anything physically happening to these two sheets of plastic which produce an effect that you simply couldn’t have expected or predicted. I was so impressed by this as a way of composing that I made many, many pieces of music using more complex variations of that…

All of my ambient music I should say, really was based on that kind of principle, on the idea that it’s possible to think of a system or a set of rules which once set in motion will create music for you…

If you move away from the idea of the composer as someone who creates a complete image and then steps back from it, there’s a different way of composing. It’s putting in motion something and letting it make the thing for you.”

Brian Eno, “Generative Music” (1996)


Resonant Thoughts: Donella H. Meadow’s Guidelines for Living in a World of Systems


Get the beat of the system.

Expose your mental models to the light of day.

Honor, respect, and distribute information.

Use language with care and enrich it with systems concepts.

Pay attention to what is important, not just what is quantifiable.

Made feedback policies for feedback systems.

Go for the good of the whole.

Listen to the wisdom of the system.

Locate responsibility within the system.

Stay humble—stay a learner.

Celebrate complexity.

Expand time horizons.

Defy the disciplines.

Expand the boundary of caring.

Don’t erode the goal of goodness.

Donella H. Meadows, Thinking in Systems: A Primer (2008), p. 194-195.

From Fretting To Positioning To Encounter Interestingness


I used to fret about how I would begin a musical project. My way out of this quandary was to make recordings based on a single sound sample—a Tibetan singing bowl for Singing Bowl Music, Tibetan finger cymbals for Finger Cymbal Music, a Thai gong for Gong Music, crotales for Organ and Crotales Music, and kalimba and crotales for Music For Piano and Metals. On these recordings I derived all of the melodic (lead) and harmonic (pad) parts from one sound, which gave the production workflow a simplicity and clarity. I didn’t have to fret because I knew my sounds in advance. On another recording, Another Kind Of Wonder, I sampled bits of my own marimba and vibraphone playing from my 1997 percussion album, Wonders. On my most recent release, Plentitudes, I recorded myself playing marimba chords and used those chords as the basis for the tracks. For the most part, at no point in the process of making these recordings was I unsure which sounds to use, because I had decided on my sounds ahead of time. A downside to some (or all?) of this music though, is that it has a severely limited and homogenous timbral palette. In a way, the pieces were etudes. 

These days I begin a project with any sound that catches my attention in the moment because I can work fast once I realize what’s happening. Sometimes I begin by designing a sound from scratch (a process which isn’t all that fast), sometimes I encounter a sound preset in my software, and sometimes I work with a sound that I recorded at an earlier time and decide to rework it. Recently, I began a track with a sound I had saved a few months ago. The sound was so unusual—sounding like a cross between a hurdy-gurdy and a pitched bicycle wheel slowly spinning around—that I immediately began playing with it. As I was playing, I thought about how I had re-encountered the sound. Finding it seemed random or lucky, but actually wasn’t: I found it by searching for sounds inside the software using a very specific search keyword—“Brett”—which lead me to a few hundred sounds of my own. 

Ideally, I would have all of my previous work conveniently ready to go. (This is one of the useful things about having a public blog: you can search its archives on the internet when you want to revisit a topic you wrote about.) The idea of having one’s previous work ready to go leads us to a production principle: 

You want to put yourself into a position where you can encounter interesting sounds. 

For me, this involves advance planning where I go through sounds I already have and make adjustments to them so that they sound like something I might want to work with and then I save them. I do the same thing with effects and effects chains. Then I forget about the sounds and the effects until I encounter them—often “randomly”—during a later session. There are many other ways to position oneself to encounter interestingness. Buying new gear that keeps you on your toes is one way: what you notice first in an unfamiliar environment is often significant and productively strange. Starting a track with an unusual constraint, such as setting the meter to 6/4 instead of the usual 4/4, is another way to re-position yourself. Sometimes as I’m adjusting a sound, I’ll decide to make something with it on the spot. Many a sound design session have been aborted after a few minutes when I decide that it’s more fun to work on a piece—even a tiny piece—than to keep shaping the sound as an abstract exercise. Remember: always keep it fun. Also: new music is worth more than a sound.  

A final variable in all this is that, while I’m hoping to randomly re-encounter a sound I had made, my search is limited by what occurs to me to search for right now. In other words, I’m the X-factor. I’m surprised how many sounds I can’t remember ever having made—it’s difficult to keep them in mind. Putting oneself into a position to encounter interesting sounds then, is also about being open to random discoveries that arrive by whim within the context in which one is searching. I’m okay with that. In the end, one of the producer’s skills is a patience to outlast impatience: to keep trying different sounds until something sounds better than the rest.